Skip to main content

Exit WCAG Theme

Switch to Non-ADA Website

Accessibility Options

Select Text Sizes

Select Text Color

Website Accessibility Information Close Options
Close Menu
 Iamele & Iamele LLP. Baltimore Personal Injury Lawyers
  • Schedule a Free Consultation

What is the Meaning of Negligent Security in Maryland?


Negligent security is a legal doctrine under Maryland law that allows a victim to sue a property owner for criminal activities occurring on the premises. An offshoot of premises liability, negligent security extends the duties of property owners to include foreseeable criminal activities. If the property owner does not provide adequate security measures to deter criminal activity — within reason, of course — then they could be liable criminal harm or injury, even if a third party is responsible.

In a negligent security claim, the injured visitor is the plaintiff; and the property owner is the defendant. The plaintiff must prove that the defendant failed to exercise reasonable care or provide adequate warnings. Consequently, the defendant should be responsible for the plaintiff’s harm or injury.

Elements of Negligent Security

Mirroring the approach of other personal injury claims, negligent security centers on the elements of duty, breach, causation and damages. Specifically, a successful negligent security claim will demonstrate that:

  • The plaintiff was a lawful visitor on the defendant’s property;
  • The defendant had a duty to provide adequate security measures;
  • The defendant breached their duty to provide adequate security measures;
  • The plaintiff suffered harm or injury from third-party criminal conduct that was foreseeable;
  • The defendant’s failure to provide adequate security was the cause of plaintiff’s harm or injury; and
  • The plaintiff’s harm or injury resulted in real damages.

Examples of Negligent Security

In negligent security cases, the most important factor is normally the issue of foreseeability. Stated otherwise, the defendant property owner must know — or have a reason to know — about a significant risk of harm or injury from third-party criminal conduct. If the defendant could not reasonably predict a risk of criminal conduct, then negligent security must not apply.

While the concept of foreseeability changes from situation to situation, there are many situations that produce an increased risk of negligent security claims. For example, a negligent security claim could arise if the defendant:

  • Ignored repeated criminal acts that occurred on their property;
  • Neglected to provide adequate training to employees or staff;
  • Refused to install security measures, such as alarms or cameras;
  • Failed to provide adequate lighting at entrances or exits or in parking lots;
  • Declined to institute security protocols or standard operating procedures; or
  • Disregarded threats of violence from employees, customers or patrons.

That being said, the Maryland courts evaluate each negligent security claim based on the specific facts at hand. As a result, it is difficult to create a standard rule that applies to every situation. Instead, property owners must exercise reasonable care to prevent harm or injury from third-party criminal acts.

Do You Need Legal Help?

If you need legal help with a negligent security claim in Maryland, it can be thoroughly beneficial to contact a knowledgeable personal injury attorney. Based in Baltimore, Maryland, the attorneys at Iamele & Iamele, LLP have many years of combined legal experience with personal injury matters, including negligent security claims. If you need legal help, contact us today for a free initial consultation.

Facebook Twitter LinkedIn

Case Results

  • $2,500,000.00
    Wrongful Death
    Sulton v. Baltimore County, et al. United States District Court Case No. 1:18-CV-02864
  • $2,000,000.00
    Negligent Security
    Client injured when crowd surge caused him to be pushed under a Light Rail Train
  • $500,000
    Police Misconduct
    Confidential Settlement, Baltimore City Circuit Court
  • $230,000.00
    Police Misconduct
    Client suffered fractured and displaced vertebrae while being handcuffed.
  • $500,000.00
    Medical Malpractice
    Inadequate Care - Confidential Settlement
  • Previous
  • Next

Free Initial Consultations

Personal Injury, Medical Malpractice, Auto, Truck and Most Accident cases are accepted with no fees or expenses to the client.

Skip footer and go back to main navigation